Impact Of Visualization Dashboards On Quality Care

Impact Of Visualization Dashboards On Quality Care

A summary is complete and concise. Enough details to
understand the study methods and findings. Minimal extra details not necessary
for understanding.

Organization of Paper:

Complete citation present at the beginning of the paper. The logical flow of ideas following the section headings of the article being
critiqued.

Establishing Context:

Context is established by

– Evaluating the author’s expertise and interest,

– Discussing generalizability, the reason for doing the
research, prior research in the same field, and funding sources,

– Discussing the importance of this research in the field of
informatics

Establishing Significance:

Significance is established by

– Research generated new ideas or approaches to a problem

– Other authors validated the research and or cited the
work,

– Did this research contribute significantly to the field of
informatics?

Evaluating the Introduction:

The evaluation of the introduction addresses:

– Statement of purpose

– Relevance of the title

– Match between the abstract and introductory paragraph

– Sequence of statements leads the reader to the statement
of purpose.

Evaluating the Methods:

The evaluation of the methods addresses:

The validity of the methods to answer the research question.

Can the study be duplicated using the methods listed in the
paper?

Flaws in methods including sample size

Clarity of methods section as a whole.

Examples to support conclusions are essential.

Evaluating the Results:

The evaluation of the results addresses:

All tables and diagrams for consistency, labeling, &
clarity.

Discrepancies between text and tables or diagrams

Text compliments figures rather than repeating the data.

Evaluating the Discussion:

The evaluation of the discussion addresses:

Does the discussion interpret the results or simply restate
them?

Does the interpretation support other studies and is it
supported by other studies in the field?

Do the authors discuss other work in the field?

Do the authors discuss future directions?

Does the author identify and weaknesses or limitations of
the study? Did they address all of them?

Article Conclusion:

The conclusion discusses the overall strengths and weaknesses of
the article and its significance in the field of health informatics.

Spelling, grammar, capitalization, and punctuation:

Paper has minimal mistakes that do not affect readability.

Supporting Evidence:

Supporting evidence presented for all conclusions and claims
in the critical review.